Paper detail

Ground-truth dataset and baseline evaluations for image base-detail separation algorithms

Base-detail separation is a fundamental computer vision problem consisting of modeling a smooth base layer with the coarse structures, and a detail layer containing the texture-like structures. One of the challenges of estimating the base is to preserve sharp boundaries between objects or parts to avoid halo artifacts. Many methods have been proposed to address this problem, but there is no ground-truth dataset of real images for quantitative evaluation. We proposed a procedure to construct such a dataset, and provide two datasets: Pascal Base-Detail and Fashionista Base-Detail, containing 1000 and 250 images, respectively. Our assumption is that the base is piecewise smooth and we label the appearance of each piece by a polynomial model. The pieces are objects and parts of objects, obtained from human annotations. Finally, we proposed a way to evaluate methods with our base-detail ground-truth and we compared the performances of seven state-of-the-art algorithms.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.