Paper detail

Ground-State Energy as a Simple Sum of Orbital Energies in Kohn-Sham Theory: A Shift in Perspective through a Shift in Potential

It is observed that the exact interacting ground-state electronic energy of interest may be obtained directly, in principle, as a simple sum of orbital energies when a universal density-dependent term is added to $w\left(\left[ ρ\right];\mathbf{r} \right)$, the familiar Hartree plus exchange-correlation component in the Kohn-Sham effective potential. The resultant shifted potential, $\bar{w}\left(\left[ ρ\right];\mathbf{r} \right)$, actually changes less on average than $w\left(\left[ ρ\right];\mathbf{r} \right)$ when the density changes, including the fact that $\bar{w}\left(\left[ ρ\right];\mathbf{r} \right)$ does not undergo a discontinuity when the number of electrons increases through an integer. Thus the approximation of $\bar{w}\left(\left[ ρ\right];\mathbf{r} \right)$ represents an alternative direct approach for the approximation of the ground-state energy and density.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.