Paper detail

Grids of stellar models with rotation VII: Models from 0.8 to 300 M$_\odot$ at super-solar metallicity (Z = 0.020)

We present a grid of stellar models at super-solar metallicity (Z = 0.020) extending the previous grids of Geneva models at solar and sub-solar metallicities. A metallicity of Z = 0.020 was chosen to match that of the inner Galactic disk. A modest increase of 43% (=0.02/0.014) in metallicity compared to solar models means that the models evolve similarly to solar models but with slightly larger mass loss. Mass loss limits the final total masses of the super-solar models to 35 M$_\odot$ even for stars with initial masses much larger than 100 M$_\odot$. Mass loss is strong enough in stars above 20 M$_\odot$ for rotating stars (25 M$_\odot$ for non-rotating stars) to remove the entire hydrogen-rich envelope. Our models thus predict SNII below 20 M$_\odot$ for rotating stars (25 M$_\odot$ for non-rotating stars) and SNIb (possibly SNIc) above that. We computed both isochrones and synthetic clusters to compare our super-solar models to the Westerlund 1 (Wd1) massive young cluster. A synthetic cluster combining rotating and non-rotating models with an age spread between log10 (age/yr) = 6.7 and 7.0 is able to reproduce qualitatively the observed populations of WR, RSG and YSG stars in Wd1, in particular their simultaneous presence at log10(L/L$_\odot$) = 5-5.5. The quantitative agreement is imperfect and we discuss the likely causes: synthetic cluster parameters, binary interactions, mass loss and their related uncertainties. In particular, mass loss in the cool part of the HRD plays a key role.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access14 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.