Paper detail

Green galaxies in the COSMOS field

We present a research of morphologies, spectra and environments of $\approx$ 2350 "green valley" galaxies at $0.2<z<1.0$ in the COSMOS field. The bimodality of dust-corrected \nuvr\ color is used to define "green valley" (thereafter, GV), which removes dusty star-forming galaxies from truly transiting galaxies between blue cloud and red sequence. Morphological parameters of green galaxies are intermediate between those of blue and red galaxy populations, both on the Gini--Asymmetry and the Gini--M$_{\rm 20}$ planes. Approximately 60% to 70% green disk galaxies have intermediate or big bulges, and only 5% to 10% are pure disk systems, based on the morphological classification with Zurich Estimator of Structural Types (ZEST). The obtained average spectra of green galaxies are intermediate between blue and red ones in terms of \oii\,, H$α$ and H$β$ emission lines. Stellar population synthesis on the average spectra show that green galaxies are averagely older than blue galaxies, but younger than red galaxies. Green galaxies have similar projected galaxy density ($Σ_{10}$) distribution with blue galaxies at $z>0.7$. At $z<0.7$, the fractions of $M_{\ast}<10^{10.0}M_{\sun}$ green galaxies located in dense environment are found to be significantly larger than those of blue galaxies. The morphological and spectral properties of green galaxies are consistent with the transiting population between blue cloud and red sequence. The possible mechanisms for quenching star formation activities in green galaxies are discussed. The importance of AGN feedback cannot be well constrained in our study. Finally, our findings suggest that environment conditions, most likely starvation and harassment, significantly affect the transformation of $M_{\ast}<10^{10.0}M_{\sun}$ blue galaxies into red galaxies, especially at $z<0.5$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.