Paper detail

Green Bank Telescope Constraints on Dark Matter Annihilation in Segue I

We use a non-detection in $ν= 1.4\,$GHz Green Bank Telescope observations of the ultra-faint dwarf spheroidal galaxy Segue I, which could be immersed in a non-negligible halo magnetic field of the Milky Way, to place bounds on particle dark matter properties. We model the galaxy using an Einasto dark matter profile, and compute the expected synchrotron flux from dark matter annihilation as a function of the magnetic field strength $B$, diffusion coefficient $D_0$, and particle mass $m_χ$ for different annihilation channels. The data strongly disfavor annihilations to $e^+e^-$ for $m_χ\lesssim 50\,$GeV, but are not sensitive to the $b \bar b$ channel. Adopting a fiducial $B \sim 2\,μ$G inferred from Segue I's proximity to the Milky Way, our models of annihilation to $τ^+τ^-$ with $m_χ= 30\,$GeV require an intermediate value of $D_0$ for consistency with the data. The most compelling limits are obtained for WIMP annihilation to $μ^+μ^-$: we exclude $m_χ\lesssim 30\,$GeV$\,\rightarrowμ^+μ^-$ at 95% confidence, unless $D_0$ exceeds the Milky Way value or $B$ is significantly smaller than we have assumed.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.