Paper detail

GRB 050502B optical afterglow: a jet break at high redshift

Aims: GRB 050502B is well known for the very bright flare displayed in its X-ray light curve. Despite extensive studies, however, the optical light curve has never been discussed and its redshift is unconstrained. Possible correlations between optical and X-ray data are analysed. Methods: Photometric data from TNG in the R and I bands were used to compare the optical afterglow with the X-ray light curve. The HyperZ package and a late time VLT host observation were used to derive redshift estimates. Results: The I-band afterglow decay followed a power-law of index α = 2.1 $\pm$ 0.6, after a late break at ~ $1.3 \times 10^5$ s. The R - I color is remarkably red and the broadband spectral index β_OX = $0.9 \pm 0.1$ is consistent with the X-ray spectral slope β_X. Although a photometric redshift of z > 4 is the most conservative result to consider, a photometric redshift of z = 5.2 $\pm$ 0.3 is suggested with no extinction in the host, based on which an isotropic energy E_γ,iso = $(3.8 \pm 0.7) \times 10^52$ erg and a jet opening angle θ ~ $3.7^{\circ}$ are subsequently derived. Conclusions: The combined X-ray and optical data suggest an achromatic break, which we interpret as a jet break. The post jet break slope obeys roughly the closure relation for the jet slow cooling model. Because of the afterglow&#39;s very red color, in order for the redshift to be low (z < 1), extinction, if present in the host, must be significantly high. Since the optical-to-X-ray index is consistent with the X-ray spectrum, and there is no XRT evidence for excess N_H, GRB 050502B was likely at high redshift.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.