Paper detail

Gravity-capillary waves in reduced models for wave-structure interactions

In order to determine the steady-state subcritical gravity-capillary waves that are produced by potential flow past a wave-making body, it is typically necessary to impose a radiation condition that allows for capillary waves upstream, but disallows those corresponding to gravity. However, this radiation condition is not known a priori and consequently, the computation of accurate numerical solutions to the steady-state problem remains problematic. Although the physical model might be modified (e.g. with viscosity), recovery of the original problem is not always possible. In this work, we discuss the above radiation problem, and show how, in the low-speed limit, the steady gravity-capillary waves can be resolved using a Sommerfeld-type boundary condition applied to an asymptotically reduced set of water-wave equations. These results allow us to validate the specialized classes of low-speed waves theoretically predicted by Trinh & Chapman (2013) using methods in exponential asymptotics [J. Fluid Mech. 724, pp. 392--424]. The issues of numerically solving the full set of gravity-capillary equations for a potential flow are discussed, and the sensitivity to errors in the boundary conditions is clearly demonstrated.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.