Paper detail

Gravitational waves or deconfined quarks: what causes the premature collapse of neutron stars born in short gamma-ray bursts?

We infer the collapse times of long-lived neutron stars into black holes using the X-ray afterglows of 18 short gamma-ray bursts. We then apply hierarchical inference to infer properties of the neutron star equation of state and dominant spin-down mechanism. We measure the maximum non-rotating neutron star mass $M_\mathrm{TOV} = 2.31 ^{+0.36}_{-0.21} M_{\odot}$ and constrain the fraction of remnants spinning down predominantly through gravitational-wave emission to $η= 0.69 ^{+0.21}_{-0.39}$ with $68 \%$ uncertainties. In principle, this method can determine the difference between hadronic and quark equation of states. In practice, however, the data is not yet informative with indications that these neutron stars do not have hadronic equation of states at the $1σ$ level. These inferences all depend on the underlying progenitor mass distribution for short gamma-ray bursts produced by binary neutron star mergers. The recently announced gravitational-wave detection of GW190425 suggests this underlying distribution is different from the locally-measured population of double neutron stars. We show that $M_\mathrm{TOV}$ and $η$ constraints depend on the fraction of binary mergers that form through a distribution consistent with the locally-measured population and a distribution that can explain GW190425. The more binaries that form from the latter distribution, the larger $M_\mathrm{TOV}$ needs to be to satisfy the X-ray observations. Our measurements above are marginalised over this unknown fraction. If instead, we assume GW190425 is not a binary neutron star merger, i.e the underlying mass distribution of double neutron stars is the same as observed locally, we measure $M_\mathrm{TOV} = 2.26 ^{+0.31}_{-0.17} M_{\odot}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.