Paper detail

Gravitational Wave Recoil and Kick Processes in the Merger of Two Colliding Black Holes: The Non Head-on Case

We examine numerically the process of gravitational wave recoil in the merger of two black holes in non head-on collision, in the realm of Robinson-Trautman spacetimes. Characteristic initial data for the system are constructed, and the evolution covers the post-merger phase up to the final configuration of the remnant black hole. The net momentum flux carried out by gravitational waves and the associated impulses are evaluated. Our analysis is based on the Bondi-Sachs conservation laws for the energy momentum of the system. The net kick velocity $V_{k}$ imparted to the merged system by the total gravitational wave impulse is also evaluated. Typically for a non head-on collision the net momentum flux carried out by gravitational waves is nonzero for equal-mass colliding black holes. The distribution of $V_{k}$ as a function of the symmetric mass ratio $η$ is well fitted by a modified Fitchett $η$-scaling law, the additional parameter modifying the law being a measure of the nonzero gravitational wave momentum flux for equal-mass initial black holes. For an initial infalling velocity $v/c \simeq 0.462$ of the colliding black holes, and incidence angle of collision $ρ_0=21^{o}$, we obtain a maximum $V_{k} \sim 121 {\rm km/s}$ located at $η\simeq 0.226$. For initial equal-mass black holes ($η=0.25$) we obtain $V_{k} \sim 107 {\rm km/s}$. Based on the integrated Bondi-Sachs momentum conservation law we discuss a possible definition of the center-of-mass velocity of the binary merged system and show that -- in an appropriate inertial frame -- it approaches asymptotically the net kick velocity, which is the velocity of the remnant black hole in this inertial frame. For larger values of $v/c$ we obtain substantially larger values of the net kick velocity, e.g., for $v/c \simeq 0.604$ a maximum $V_{k} \sim 610 {\rm km/s}$ is obtained.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.