Paper detail

Gravitational wave non-linearities and pulsar-timing array angular correlations

Several pulsar-timing array (PTA) collaborations are finding tantalising hints for a stochastic gravitational wave background signal in the nano-Hertz regime. So far, though, no convincing evidence for the expected Hellings-Downs quadrupolar correlations has been found. While this issue might get fixed at the light of more accurate, forthcoming data, it is important to keep an eye open on different possibilities, and explore scenarios able to produce different types of PTA angular correlations. We point out that a stationary non-Gaussian component to the gravitational wave background can modulate the 2-point PTA overlap reduction function, adding contributions that can help in fitting the angular distribution of PTA data. We discuss possible sources for such non-Gaussian signal in terms of cosmological processes occurring after inflation ends, and we investigate further tests for this idea.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.