Paper detail

Gravitational wave generation in a viable scenario of inflationary magnetogenesis

Generation of magnetic fields during inflation is a promising mechanism for the origin of the observed large scale magnetic fields in the universe. Among several attempts, a popular model is one where the inflaton and the electromagnetic field are coupled through a coupling function $f$ leading to a term in the Lagrangian density of the form, $f^2 F^{μν} F_{μν}$. A number of potential difficulties with such models have been raised in the literature. In our earlier work, we have suggested viable models of inflationary magnetogenesis which avoid these problems and at the same time can lead to either nonhelical or helical magnetic fields of astrophysical interest. Our models require a low energy scale for inflation and reheating (reheating temperature, $T_R < 10^4$ GeV) and generate a blue spectrum of electromagnetic (EM) field which peaks around the horizon scale of reheating. We show here that the anisotropic stress associated with these EM fields naturally source the production of a stochastic background of Gravitational waves (GW) with frequencies in the range of tens of nano Hertz to milli Hertz. These two extremes of the range can be probed respectively by pulsar timing arrays (PTA) experiments and the upcoming Laser Interferometric Space Array (LISA). The peak value of the GW spectrum energy represented by $d Ω_{GW}/d \ln k$ is $ 10^{-6} $ for the models which lead to nonhelical primordial fields and $2 \times 10^{-6} $ for the helical case for $T_R=100$ GeV. In this case the spectrum peaks at a frequency $30 μ$Hz for non helical case and at $40 μ$Hz for helical case. These values are obtained when the ratio of EM energy density to the cosmological density at reheating $ε\sim 1$ and decrease approximately as $ε^2$ for smaller values.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.