Paper detail

Gravitational-wave bursts and stochastic background from superfluid vortex avalanches during pulsar glitches

The current-quadrupole gravitational-wave signal emitted during the spin-up phase of a pulsar glitch is calculated from first principles by modeling the vortex dynamics observed in recent Gross-Pitaevskii simulations of pinned, decelerating quantum condensates. Homogeneous and inhomogeneous unpinning geometries, representing creep- and avalanche-like glitches, provide lower and upper bounds on the gravitational wave signal strength respectively. The signal arising from homogeneous glitches is found to scale with the square root of glitch size, whereas the signal from inhomogeneous glitches scales proportional to glitch size. The signal is also computed as a function of vortex travel distance and stellar angular velocity. Convenient amplitude scalings are derived as functions of these parameters. For the typical astrophysical situation, where the glitch duration (in units of the spin period) is large compared to the vortex travel distance (in units of the stellar radius), an individual glitch from an object $1\,\rm{kpc}$ from Earth generates a wave strain of $10^{-24} [(Δω/ω) / 10^{-7}] (ω/10^2 \rm{rad s}^{-1})^3 (Δr / 10^{-2} \rm{m})^{-1}$, where $Δr$ is the average distance travelled by a vortex during a glitch, $Δω/ω$ is the fractional glitch size, and $ω$ is the pulsar angular velocity. The non-detection of a signal from the 2006 Vela glitch in data from the fifth science run conducted by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory implies that the glitch duration exceeds $\sim 10^{-4}\,\rm{ms}$. This represents the first observational lower bound on glitch duration to be obtained.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.