Gravitational wave background from mergers of large primordial black holes

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Abstract

The Peters formula, which tells how the coalescence time of a binary system emitting gravitational radiation is determined by the initial size and shape of the elliptic orbit, is often used in estimating the merger rate of primordial black holes and the gravitational wave background from the mergers. Valid as it is in some interesting scenarios, such as the analysis of the LIGO-Virgo events, the Peters formula fails to describe the coalescence time if the orbital period of the binary exceeds the value given by the formula. This could underestimate the event rate of mergers that occur before the cosmic time t∼1013 st\sim 10^{13}\ \text{s}. As a result, the energy density spectrum of the gravitational wave background could develop a peak, which is from mergers occurring at either t∼1013 st\sim 10^{13}\ \text{s} (for black holes with mass M≳108M⊙M\gtrsim 10^8 M_\odot) or t∼1026(M/M⊙)−5/3 st\sim 10^{26}(M/M_\odot)^{-5/3}\ \text{s} (for 105M⊙≲M≲108M⊙10^5 M_\odot \lesssim M\lesssim 10^8 M_\odot). This can be used to constrain the fraction of dark matter in primordial black holes (denoted by ff) if potential probes (such as SKA and U-DECIGO) do not discover such a background, with the result f≲10−6-10−4f\lesssim 10^{-6}\text{-}10^{-4} for the mass range 10-109M⊙10\text{-} 10^9M_\odot. We then consider the effect of mass accretion onto primordial black holes at redshift z∼10z\sim 10, and find that the merger rate could drop significantly at low redshifts. The spectrum of the gravitational wave background thus gets suppressed at the high-frequency end. This feature might be captured by future detectors such as ET and CE for initial mass M=O(10-100)M⊙M= \mathcal{O}(10\text{-}100) M_\odot with f≳10−4f\gtrsim 10^{-4}.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.