Paper detail

Gravitational redshifts in main-sequence and giant stars

Gravitational redshifts in solar-type main-sequence stars are expected to be some 500 ms$^{-1}$ greater than those in giants. Such a signature is searched for between groups of open-cluster stars which share the same average space motion and thus have the same average Doppler shift. 144 main-sequence stars and cool giants were observed in the M67 open cluster using the ESO FEROS spectrograph, obtaining radial velocities by cross correlation with a spectral template. M67 dwarf and giant radial-velocity distributions are well represented by Gaussian functions, sharing the same apparent average radial velocity within $\simeq$ 100 ms$^{-1}$. In addition, dwarfs in M67 appear to be dynamically hotter ($σ$ = 0.90 kms$^{-1}$) than giants ($σ$ = 0.68 kms$^{-1}$). Explanations for the lack of an expected signal are sought: a likely cause is the differential wavelength shifts produced by different hydrodynamics in dwarf and giant atmospheres. Radial-velocity differences measured between unblended lines in low-noise averaged spectra vary with line-strength: stronger lines are more blushifted in dwarfs than in giants, apparently 'compensating' for the gravitational redshift. Synthetic high-resolution spectra are computed from 3-dimensional hydrodynamic model atmospheres for both giants and dwarfs, and synthetic wavelength shifts obtained. In agreement with observations, 3D models predict substantially smaller wavelength-shift differences than expected from gravitational redshift only. The procedures developed could be used to test 3D models for different classes of stars, but will ultimately require high-fidelity spectra for measurements of wavelength shifts in individual spectral lines.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.