Paper detail

Gravitational redshift and other redshift-space distortions of the imaginary part of the power spectrum

I extend the usual linear-theory formula for large-scale clustering in redshift-space to include gravitational redshift. The extra contribution to the standard galaxy power spectrum is suppressed by k_c^{-2}, where k_c=c k/a H (k is the wavevector, a the expansion factor, and H=\dot{a}/a), and is thus effectively limited to the few largest-scale modes and very difficult to detect; however, a correlation, \propto k_c^{-1}, is generated between the real and imaginary parts of the Fourier space density fields of two different types of galaxy, which would otherwise be zero, i.e., the cross-power spectrum has an imaginary part: P_{ab}(k,μ)/P(k)=(b_a+fμ^2)(b_b+fμ^2) -i(3Ω_m/2)(μ/k_c)(b_a-b_b)+\mathcal{O}(k_c^{-2}), where P(k) is the real-space mass-density power spectrum, b_i are the galaxy biases, μis the cosine of the angle between the wavevector and line of sight, and f=dlnD/dlna (D is the linear growth factor). The total signal-to-noise of measurements of this effect is not dominated by the largest scales -- it converges at k~0.05 h/Mpc. This gravitational redshift result is pedagogically interesting, but naive in that it is gauge dependent and there are other effects of similar form and size, related to the transformation between observable and proper coordinates. I include these effects, which add other contributions to the coefficient of μ/k_c, and add a μ^3/k_c term, but don't qualitatively change the picture. The leading source of noise in the measurement is galaxy shot-noise, not sample variance, so developments that allow higher S/N surveys can make this measurement powerful, although it would otherwise be only marginally detectable in a JDEM-scale survey.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.