Paper detail

Gravitational Lensing of Anisotropic Sources

In strong gravitational lensing, the multiple images we see correspond to light rays that leave the source in slightly different directions. If the source emission is anisotropic, the images may differ from conventional lensing predictions (which assume isotropy). To identify scales on which source anisotropy may be important, we study the angle delta between the light rays emerging from the source, for different lensing configurations. If the lens has a power law profile M propto R^gamma, the angle delta initially increases with lens redshift and then either diverges (for a steep profile gamma<1), remains constant (for an isothermal profile gamma=1), or vanishes (for a shallow profile gamma>1) as zl approaches zs. The scaling with lens mass is roughly delta propto M^(1/(2-gamma)). The results for an NFW profile are qualitatively similar to those for a shallow power law, with delta peaking at about half the redshift of the source (not half the distance). In practice, beaming could modify the statistics of beamed sources lensed by massive clusters: for an opening angle theta_jet, there is a probability as high as P ~ 0.02-0.07 (theta_jet/{0.5} deg)^-1 that one of the lensed images may be missed (for 2 < zs < 6). Differential absorption within Active Galactic Nuclei could modify the flux ratios of AGNs lensed by clusters; a sample of AGNs lensed by clusters could provide further constraints on the sizes of absorbing regions. Source anisotropy is not likely to be a significant effect in galaxy-scale strong lensing.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.