Paper detail

Gravitational instability in protostellar disks at low metallicities

Fragmentation of protostellar disks controls the growth of protostars and plays a key role in determining the final mass of newborn stars. In this paper, we investigate the structure and gravitational stability of the protostellar disks in the full metallicity range between zero and the solar value. Using the mass-accretion rates evaluated from the thermal evolution in the preceding collapse phase of the pre-stellar cores, we calculate disk structures and their evolution in the framework of the standard steady disks. Overall, with higher metallicity, more efficient cooling results in the lower accretion rate and lower temperature inside the disk: at zero metallicity, the accretion rate is ~ 1e-3Msun/yr and the disk temperature is ~ 1000 K, while at solar metallicity, ~ 1e-6Msun/yr and 10 K. Despite the large difference in these values, the zero- and solar-metallicity disks have similar stability properties: the Toomre parameter for the gravitational stability, which can be written using the ratio of temperatures in the disk and in the envelope as Q ~ (T_disk/T_env)^3/2, is > 1, i.e., marginally stable. At intermediate metallicities of 1e-5--1e-3Zsun, however, the disks are found to be strongly unstable with Q ~ 0.1--1 since dust cooling, which is effective only in the disks due to their high density (> 1e10 cm^-3), makes the temperature in the disks lower than that in the envelopes. This indicates that masses of the individual stars formed as a result of the protostellar disk fragmentation can be significantly smaller than their parent core in this metallicity range. The typical stellar mass in this case would be a few Msun, which is consistent with the observationally suggested mass-scale of extremely metal-poor stars.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.