Paper detail

Gravitational field of a pit and maximal mass defects

A general relativistic solution, composed of a Zel'dovich-Letelier interior made of radial strings matched through a spherical thin shell at radius $r_0$ to an exterior Schwarzschild solution with mass $m$, is presented. It is the Zel'dovich-Letelier-Schwarzschild star. When the radius $r_0$ of the star is shrunk to its gravitational radius $2m$, the solutions have interesting properties. There are solutions with $m=0$ and $r_0=0$ that obey $\frac{2m}{r_0}=1$. The solutions have a horizon, but are not black holes, they are quasiblack holes, though atypical. The proper mass $m_p$ of the interior is nonzero and made of one string. Hence, a Minkowski exterior space hides an interior with matter in a pit. These are the pit solutions and show a maximal mass defect. There are two classes of pit solutions, one a finite string and the other a semi-infinite one. These pits are really string pits, that can be seen as Wheeler bags of gold, albeit squashed bags. There is another class, which is a compact stringy star at the $\frac{2m}{r_0}=1$ limit with $m$ nonzero. It is a typical quasiblack hole and it has maximal mass defect. Generically pit solutions with $\frac{2m}{r_0}=1$ and $m=0$ can exist with maximal mass defects. The Zel'dovich-Letelier-Schwarzschild star at the $r_0=2m$ limit is an instance of it. These three classes of static solutions yield the same spectrum of solutions that appear in critical gravitational collapse, there are solutions that yield naked null singularities, which here are the two string pit classes, there are solutions that yield black holes, which here are represented by the compact stringy stars at the quasiblack hole limit, and the solutions that disperse away in critical collapse here are the static Zel'dovich-Letelier-Schwarzschild stars. Thermodynamics of the string pit and stringy star quasiblack hole solutions is provided, and other connections are mentioned.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.