Paper detail

Gravitational deflection of light and shadow cast by rotating Kalb-Ramond black holes

The nonminimal coupling of the nonzero vacuum expectation value of the self-interacting antisymmetric Kalb-Ramond field with gravity leads to a power-law hairy black hole having a parameter $s$, which encompasses the Reissner$-$Nordstrom black hole ($s=1$). We obtain the axially symmetric counterpart of this hairy solution, namely, the rotating Kalb-Ramond black hole, which encompasses, as special cases, Kerr ($s=0$) and Kerr-Newman ($s=1$) black holes. Interestingly, for a set of parameters ($M, a$, and $Γ$), there exists an extremal value of the Kalb-Ramond parameter ($s=s_{e}$), which corresponds to an extremal black hole with degenerate horizons, while for $s<s_{e}$, it describes a nonextremal black hole with Cauchy and event horizons, and no black hole for $s>s_{e}$. We find that the extremal value $s_e$ is also influenced by these parameters. The black hole shadow size decreases monotonically and the shape gets more distorted with an increasing $s$; in turn, shadows of rotating Kalb-Ramond black holes are smaller and more distorted than the corresponding Kerr black hole shadows. We investigate the effect of the Kalb-Ramond field on the rotating black hole spacetime geometry and analytically deduced corrections to the light deflection angle from the Kerr and Schwarzschild black hole values. The deflection angle for Sgr A* and the shadow caused by the supermassive black hole M87* are included and compared with analogous results of Kerr black holes. The inferred circularity deviation $ΔC\leq 0.10$ for the M87* black hole merely constrains the Kalb-Ramond field parameter, whereas shadow angular diameter $θ_d=42\pm 3\, μ$as, within the $1σ$ region, places bounds $Γ\leq 0.09205$ for $s=1$ and $Γ\leq 0.02178$ for $s=3$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.