Paper detail

Gravitational Collapse, Negative World and Complex Holism

Building on the engine-pump paradigm of ChaNoXity, this paper argues that complex holism - as the competitive homeostasis of dispersion and concentration - is the operating mode of Nature. Specifically, we show that the negative world \mathfrak{W} is a gravitationally collapsed black hole that was formed at big-bang time t=0 as the pair (W,\mathfrak{W}), with W a real world, and gravity the unique expression of the maximal multifunctional nonlinearity of the negative world \mathfrak{W} in the functional reality of W. The temperature of a gravitationally collapsed system does enjoy the relationship T\propto1/r with its radius, but the entropy follows the usual volumetric alignment with microstates, reducing to the surface approximation only at small r. It is not clear if quantum non-locality is merely a linear manifestation of complex holism, with the interaction of quantum gates in quantum entanglements resulting in distinctive features from the self-evolved structures of complex holism remaining an open question for further investigation

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.