Paper detail

Gravitational Absorption Lines

We consider the gravitational analogue of Lyman-alpha absorption lines in astronomical spectroscopy. If Einstein gravity with minimally coupled matter is valid up to the Planck scale, quantum bound states absorb gravitons of a specific frequency with Planckian cross section, $σ_{\text{abs}} \approx l_p^2$. Consequently, one can show that gravitational absorption by bound states is inefficient in ordinary gravity. If observed, gravitational absorption lines would therefore constitute a powerful smoking gun of new exotic astrophysical bound states (near extremal bound states) or new gravitational physics, as well as give direct evidence of the quantized nature of the gravitational field. We provide, as an example of new gravitational physics near the Planck scale, a non-minimal coupling of the matter fields which breaks the equivalence principle on-shell. We lay out a model in which absorption lines in the primordial gravitational wave spectrum are produced as a consequence of this coupling.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.