Paper detail

Graphs cannot be indexed in polynomial time for sub-quadratic time string matching, unless SETH fails

We consider the following string matching problem on a node-labeled graph $G=(V,E)$: given a pattern string $P$, decide whether there exists a path in $G$ whose concatenation of node labels equals $P$. This is a basic primitive in various problems in bioinformatics, graph databases, or networks. The hardness results of Backurs and Indyk (FOCS 2016) imply that this problem cannot be solved in better than $O(|E||P|)$ time, under the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis (OVH), and this holds even under various restrictions on the graph (Equi et al., ICALP 2019). In this paper we consider its offline version, namely the one in which we are allowed to index the graph in order to support time-efficient string matching queries. Indeed, it was tantalizing in the string matching community to believe that sub-quadratic time queries can be achieved, e.g. at the cost of a high-degree polynomial-time indexing. We disprove this belief, showing that, under OVH, no polynomial-time index can support querying $P$ in time $O(|E|^δ|P|^β)$, with either $δ< 1$ or $β< 1$. We prove this tight bound employing a known self-reducibility technique, e.g. from the field of dynamic algorithms, which translates conditional lower bounds for an online problem to its offline version. As a side-contribution, we formalize this technique with the notion of linear independent-components reduction, allowing for a simple proof of our result. As another illustration of our technique, we also translate the quadratic conditional lower bound of Backurs and Indyk (STOC 2015) for the problem of matching a query string inside a text, under edit distance. We obtain an analogous tight quadratic lower bound for its offline version, improving the recent result of Cohen-Addad, Feuilloley and Starikovskaya (SODA 2019), but with a slightly different boundary condition.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.