Paper detail

Graphene and MoS2 interacting with water: a comparison by ab initio calculations

Although very similar in many technological applications, graphene and MoS2 bear significant differences if exposed to humid environments. As an example, lubrication properties of graphene are reported to improve while those of MoS2 to deteriorate: it is unclear whether this is due to oxidation from disulfide to oxide or to water adsorption on the sliding surface. By means of ab initio calculations we show here that these two layered materials have similar adsorption energies for water on the basal planes. They both tend to avoid water intercalation between their layers and to display only mild reactivity of defects located on the basal plane. It is along the edges where marked differences arise: graphene edges are more reactive at the point that they immediately prompt water splitting. MoS2 edges are more stable and consequently water adsorption is much less favoured than in graphene. We also show that water-driven oxidation of MoS2 layers is unfavoured with respect to adsorption.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.