Paper detail

Graph Reachability and Pebble Automata over Infinite Alphabets

Let D denote an infinite alphabet -- a set that consists of infinitely many symbols. A word w = a_0 b_0 a_1 b_1 ... a_n b_n of even length over D can be viewed as a directed graph G_w whose vertices are the symbols that appear in w, and the edges are (a_0,b_0),(a_1,b_1),...,(a_n,b_n). For a positive integer m, define a language R_m such that a word w = a_0 b_0 ... a_n b_n is in R_m if and only if there is a path in the graph G_w of length <= m from the vertex a_0 to the vertex b_n. We establish the following hierarchy theorem for pebble automata over infinite alphabet. For every positive integer k, (i) there exists a k-pebble automaton that accepts the language R_{2^k-1}; (ii) there is no k-pebble automaton that accepts the language R_{2^{k+1} - 2}. Based on this result, we establish a number of previously unknown relations among some classes of languages over infinite alphabets.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.