Paper detail

Graph Operations on Parity Games and Polynomial-Time Algorithms

Parity games are games that are played on directed graphs whose vertices are labeled by natural numbers, called priorities. The players push a token along the edges of the digraph. The winner is determined by the parity of the greatest priority occurring infinitely often in this infinite play. A motivation for studying parity games comes from the area of formal verification of systems by model checking. Deciding the winner in a parity game is polynomial time equivalent to the model checking problem of the modal mu-calculus. Another strong motivation lies in the fact that the exact complexity of solving parity games is a long-standing open problem, the currently best known algorithm being subexponential. It is known that the problem is in the complexity classes UP and coUP. In this paper we identify restricted classes of digraphs where the problem is solvable in polynomial time, following an approach from structural graph theory. We consider three standard graph operations: the join of two graphs, repeated pasting along vertices, and the addition of a vertex. Given a class C of digraphs on which we can solve parity games in polynomial time, we show that the same holds for the class obtained from C by applying once any of these three operations to its elements. These results provide, in particular, polynomial time algorithms for parity games whose underlying graph is an orientation of a complete graph, a complete bipartite graph, a block graph, or a block-cactus graph. These are classes where the problem was not known to be efficiently solvable. Previous results concerning restricted classes of parity games which are solvable in polynomial time include classes of bounded tree-width, bounded DAG-width, and bounded clique-width. We also prove that recognising the winning regions of a parity game is not easier than computing them from scratch.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.