Paper detail

graph-GPA 2.0: A Graphical Model for Multi-disease Analysis of GWAS Results with Integration of Functional Annotation Data

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully identified a large number of genetic variants associated with traits and diseases. However, it still remains challenging to fully understand functional mechanisms underlying many associated variants. This is especially the case when we are interested in variants shared across multiple phenotypes. To address this challenge, we propose graph-GPA 2.0 (GGPA 2.0), a novel statistical framework to integrate GWAS datasets for multiple phenotypes and incorporate functional annotations within a unified framework. We conducted simulation studies to evaluate GGPA 2.0. The results indicate that incorporating functional annotation data using GGPA 2.0 does not only improve detection of disease-associated variants, but also allows to identify more accurate relationships among diseases. We analyzed five autoimmune diseases and five psychiatric disorders with the functional annotations derived from GenoSkyline and GenoSkyline-Plus and the prior disease graph generated by biomedical literature mining. For autoimmune diseases, GGPA 2.0 identified enrichment for blood, especially B cells and regulatory T cells across multiple diseases. Psychiatric disorders were enriched for brain, especially prefrontal cortex and inferior temporal lobe for bipolar disorder (BIP) and schizophrenia (SCZ), respectively. Finally, GGPA 2.0 successfully identified the pleiotropy between BIP and SCZ. These results demonstrate that GGPA 2.0 can be a powerful tool to identify associated variants associated with each phenotype or those shared across multiple phenotypes, while also promoting understanding of functional mechanisms underlying the associated variants.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.