Paper detail

GrantMed: a new, international system for tracking grants and funding trends in the life sciences

Despite the success of PubMed and other search engines in managing the massive volume of biomedical literature and the retrieval of individual publications, grant-related data remains scattered and relatively inaccessible. This is problematic, as project and funding data has significant analytical value and could be integral to publication retrieval. Here, we introduce GrantMed, a searchable international database of biomedical grants that integrates some 20 million publications with the nearly 1.4 million research projects and 650 billion dollars of funding that made them possible. For any given topic in the life sciences, Grantmed provides instantaneous visualization of the past 30 years of dollars spent and projects awarded, along with detailed individual project descriptions, funding amounts, and links to investigators, research organizations, and resulting publications. It summarizes trends in funding and publication rates for areas of interest and merges data from various national grant databases to create one international grant tracking system. This information will benefit the research community and funding entities alike. Users can view trends over time or current projects underway and use this information to navigate the decision-making process in moving forward. They can view projects prior to publication and records of previous projects. Convenient access to this data for analytical purposes will be beneficial in many ways, helping to prevent project overlap, reduce funding redundancy, identify areas of success, accelerate dissemination of ideas, and expose knowledge gaps in moving forward. It is our hope that this will be a central resource for international life sciences research communities and the funding organizations that support them, ultimately streamlining progress.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.