Paper detail

Grand Pleromal Transmutation : condensates via Konsishi anomaly, dimensional transmutation and ultraminimal GUTs

Using consistency requirements relating chiral condensates imposed by the so called Generalized Konishi Anomaly, we show that dimensional transmutation via gaugino condensation {\emph{in the ultraviolet}} drives gauge symmetry breaking in a large class of {\emph{asymptotically strong}} Super Yang Mills Higgs theories. For Adjoint multiplet type chiral superfields $Φ$ (transforming as $r \times \bar r$ representations of a non Abelian gauge group G), solution of the Generalized Konishi Anomaly(GKA) equations allows calculation of quantum corrected VEVs in terms of the dimensional transmutation scale $Λ_{UV} \simeq M_X \, e^{\frac{8π^2}{ g^2(M_X) b_0}} $ which determines the gaugino condensate. Thus the gauge coupling at the perturbative unification scale $M_X$ generates GUT symmetry breaking VEVs by non-perturbative dimensional transmutation. This obviates the need for large(or any) input mass scales in the superpotential. Rank reduction can be achieved by including pairs of chiral superfields transforming as either $({\bf Q}(r),{ \bf\bar Q}(\bar r))$ or $ (\Sig((r\otimes r)_{symm})), \Sigb(({\bar r \otimes\bar r})_{symm})$, that form trilinear matrix gauge invariants $\bar Q\cdot Φ\cdot Q, \Sigb \cdot Φ\cdot \Sig $ with $Φ$. Novel, robust and {\emph{ultraminimal}} Grand unification algorithms emerge from the analysis. We sketch the structure of a realistic Spin(10) model, with the $16$-plet of Spin(10) as the base representation $r$, which mimics the realistic Minimal Supersymmetric GUT but contains even fewer free parameters. We argue that our results point to a large extension of the dominant and normative paradigms of Asymptotic Freedom$/$IR colour confinement and potential driven spontaneous symmetry breaking that have long ruled gauge theories.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.