Paper detail

Grain boundary-induced martensitic transformations: A phase-field study of nucleation, size-effect, triple junction-effect, microstructures, and compatibility at the nanoscale

An original thermodynamically consistent large strains-based multiphase phase-field (PF) approach of Ginzburg-Landau type is developed for studying the grain boundary (GB)-induced martensitic transformations (MTs) in polycrystalline materials at the nanoscale considering the structural stresses within the interfaces. In this general PF approach, N independent order parameters are used for describing the austenite (A)<->martensite (M) transformations and N(>1) martensitic variants, and another M independent order parameters are considered for describing M(>1) grains in the polycrystalline samples. The change in the GB energy due to its structural rearrangement during MTs is considered using variable energy for the GB(s) as a function of the order parameter related to the A<->M transformation. A rich plot for the temperatures of transformations between the A, premartensite, and M in a bicrystal with a symmetric planar tilt GB are plotted for the varying austenitic GB width. The strong effects of the parameters, including the austenitic GB width, change in GB energy due to MTs, GB misorientation, applied strains, and sample size on heterogeneous nucleation of the phases and the subsequent complex martensitic microstructures evolution are explored in various bicrystals with symmetric or asymmetric planar or circular tilt GBs during the forward and reverse transformations. The triple junction (TJ) energy and the energy and width of the adjacent GBs are also shown to strongly influence the nucleation and microstructures using the tricrystals having three symmetric planar tilt GBs. The compatibility of the microstructures across the GBs is studied. The elastic and structural stresses across the GBs and TJ regions are plotted, which is essential for understanding the role of GBs and TJs in materials failure.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.