Paper detail

Gradients of chemical abundances in the Milky Way from HII regions: distances derived from Gaia EDR3 parallaxes and temperature inhomogeneities

We present a reassessment of the radial abundance gradients of He, C, N, O, Ne, S, Cl, and Ar in the Milky Way using the deep optical spectra of 42 HII regions presented in Arellano-Córdova et al. (2020, 2021) and Méndez-Delgado et al. (2020) exploring the impact of: (1) new distance determinations based on Gaia EDR3 parallaxes and (2) the use of Peimbert's temperature fluctuations paradigm ($t ^ 2> 0$) for deriving ionic abundances. We find that distances based on Gaia EDR3 data are more consistent with kinematic ones based on Galactic rotation curves calibrated with radio parallaxes, which give less dispersion and uncertainties than those calibrated with spectrophotometric stellar distances. The distances based on the Gaia parallaxes --DR2 or EDR3-- eliminate the internal flattening observed in previous determinations of the Galactic gradients at smaller distances than $\sim 7$ kpc. Abundances and gradients determined assuming $ t ^ 2> 0 $ -- not only for O but also for the rest of elements -- are not affected by the abundance discrepancy problem and give elemental abundances much consistent with the solar ones for most elements. We find that our radial abundance gradient of He is consistent with the most accurate estimates of the primordial He abundance. We do not find evidence of azimuthal variations in the chemical abundances of our sample. Moreover, the small dispersion in the O gradient -- indicator of metallicity in photoionized regions -- indicate that the gas of the HII regions is well mixed in the sampled areas of the Galaxy.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.