Paper detail

Gradient sub-grid-scale model for relativistic MHD Large Eddy Simulations

MHD turbulence is likely to play an important role in several astrophysical scenarios where the magnetic Reynolds is very large. Numerically, these cases can be studied efficiently by means of Large Eddy Simulations, in which the computational resources are used to evolve the system only up to a finite grid size. The resolution is not fine enough to capture all the relevant small-scale physics at play, which is instead effectively modeled by a set of additional terms in the evolution equations, dubbed as sub-grid-scale model. Here we extend such approach, commonly used in non-relativistic/non-magnetic/incompressible fluid dynamics, applying the so-called gradient model to a general set of balance-law equations, that includes the relevant case in which a non-trivial inversion of conserved to primitive fields is needed. In particular, we focus on the relativistic compressible ideal MHD scenario, providing for the first time (and for any equation of state) all the additional sub-grid-scale terms. As an application, we consider box simulations of the relativistic Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, which is also the first mechanism responsible for the magnetic field amplification in binary neutron star mergers and cannot yet be fully captured by the finest-grid and longest simulations available. The performance of our model is numerically assessed by comparing it to the residuals arising from the filtering of high-resolution simulations. We find that the model can fit very well those residuals from resolutions a few times higher. Although the application shown here explicitly considers the Minkowski metric, it can be directly extended to general relativity, thus settling the basis to implement the gradient sub-grid model in a GRMHD binary merger. Our results suggest that this approach will be potentially able to unveil much better the small-scale dynamics achievable in full GRMHD simulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.