Paper detail

Gr{ö}bner basis. a "pseudo-polynomial" algorithm for computing the Frobenius number

Let consider $n$ natural numbers $a\_1 ,\ldots , a\_{n} $. Let $S$ be the numerical semigroup generated by $a\_1 ,\ldots , a\_{n} $. Set $A=K[t^{a\_1}, \ldots , t^{a\_n}]=K[{x\_1}, \ldots , {x\_n}]/I$. The aim of this paper is: \begin{enumerate}\item Give an effective pseudo-polynomial algorithm on $a\_1$, which computes The Ap{é}ry set and the Frobenius number of $S$. As a consequence it also solves in pseudo-polynomial time the integer knapsack problem : given a natural integer b, b belongs to $S$?\item The \gbb of $I$ for the reverse lexicographic order to $x\_n,\ldots ,x\_1$, without using Buchberger's algorithm. \item $\ini{I} $ for the reverse lexicographic order to $x\_n,\ldots ,x\_1$.\item $A$ as a $K[t^{ a\_1 }]$-module. \end{enumerate} We dont know the complexity of our algorithm. We need to solve the "multiplicative" integer knapsack problem: Find all positive integer solutions $({k\_1}, \ldots , {k\_n})$ of the inequality $\prod\_{i=2}^n (k\_i+1)\leq a\_1+1$. This algorithm is easily implemented. The implementation of this algorithm "frobenius-number-mm", for $n=17 $, can be downloaded in \hfill\breakhttps://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~morales/frobenius-number-mm

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.