Paper detail

Good Sections of Arithmetic Fundamental Groups

In this paper we exhibit the notion of (uniformly) good sections of arithmetic fundamental groups. We introduce and investigate the problem of cuspidalisation of sections of arithmetic fundamental groups, its ultimate aim is to reduce the solution of the Grothendieck anabelian section conjecture to the solution of its birational version. We show that (uniformly) good sections of arithmetic fundamental groups of smooth, proper, and geometrically connected hyperbolic curves over slim (and regular) fields can be lifted to sections of cuspidally abelian absolute Galois groups. As an application we prove a (pro-p) p-adic version of the Grothendieck anabelian section conjecture for hyperbolic curves, under the assumption that the existence of sections of arithmetic fundamental groups, and cuspidally abelian Galois groups, implies the existence of tame points. We also prove that the existence of uniformly good sections of arithmetic fundamental groups for hyperbolic curves over number fields implies the existence of divisors of degree 1, under a finiteness condition of the Tate-Shafarevich group of the jacobian of the curve.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.