Paper detail

Goldbach for Gaussian, Hurwitz, Octavian and Eisenstein primes

We formulate Goldbach type questions for Gaussian, Hurwitz, Octavian and Eisenstein primes. They are different from Goldbach type statements by Takayoshi Mitsui from 1960 for number fields or C.A. Holben and James Jordan from 1968 for Gaussian integers. Here is what we meeasure: 1) Every even Gaussian integer a+ib satisfying a>2, b>2 is a sum of two Gaussian primes with positive coefficients. 2) Every Eisenstein integer a+bw with a>3,b>3 and w=(1+sqrt(-3))/2 is the sum of two Eisenstein primes with positive coefficients. Note that no evenness condition is asked in the Eisenstein case. 3) Every Lipschitz integer quaternion with positive entries is the sum of two Hurwitz primes. 4) There exists a constant K such that every Octavian integer with coefficients larger than K is the sum of two Octavian primes. Except in the Octonion case, where the fewest experiments were done, the statements can be linked to difficult questions like Landau or Bunyakovsky conjectures. We therefore look also more closely and numerically at some Hardy-Littlewood constants following early computations from Daniel Shanks and Marvin Wunderlich from the 50ies and 70ies.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.