Paper detail

Going, going, gone dark: Quantifying the scatter in the faintest dwarf galaxies

We predict the stellar mass-halo mass (SMHM) relationship for dwarf galaxies and their satellites residing in halos down to M$_{halo} =$ 10$^7$ M$_{\odot}$ with 10$^4$ M$_{\odot} <$ M$_{star}$($z=0$) $< 10^8$ M$_{\odot}$, and quantify the predicted scatter in the relation at the low mass end, using cosmological simulations. The galaxies were drawn from a cosmological simulation of dwarf galaxies, run with the N-body + SPH code, ChaNGA, at a high resolution of 60 pc. For M$_{halo} > 10^9$ M$_{\odot}$, the simulated SMHM relationship agrees with literature determinations, including exhibiting a small scatter. However, the scatter in the SMHM relation increases dramatically for lower-mass halos. We find that some of this scatter is due to {\em dark dwarfs}, halos devoid of stars. However, even when only considering well-resolved halos that contain a stellar population, the scatter in stellar mass reaches nearly 1 dex for M$_{halo}$($z=0$) 10$^7$ M$_{\odot}$. Much of this scatter is due to including satellites of the dwarf galaxies that have had their halo masses reduced through tidal stripping. The fraction of dark dwarfs (those that contain no stars) increases substantially with decreasing halo mass. When these dark halos are considered, the true scatter in the SMHM at low masses is even larger. At the faintest end of the SMHM relation probed by our simulations, a galaxy cannot be assigned a unique halo mass based solely on its luminosity. We provide a formula to stochastically populate low-mass halos following our results. Our predicted large scatter at low halo masses increases the slope of the resulting stellar mass function on the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy scales currently being probed by such surveys as the Dark Energy Survey or the Hyper-Suprime Cam Subaru Strategic Program, and in the future by the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope.

preprint2017arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.