Paper detail

Going for Speed: Sublinear Algorithms for Dense r-CSPs

We give new sublinear and parallel algorithms for the extensively studied problem of approximating n-variable r-CSPs (constraint satisfaction problems with constraints of arity r up to an additive error. The running time of our algorithms is O(n/ε^2) + 2^O(1/ε^2) for Boolean r-CSPs and O(k^4 n / ε^2) + 2^O(log k / ε^2) for r-CSPs with constraints on variables over an alphabet of size k. For any constant k this gives optimal dependence on n in the running time unconditionally, while the exponent in the dependence on 1/εis polynomially close to the lower bound under the exponential-time hypothesis, which is 2^Ω(ε^(-1/2)). For Max-Cut this gives an exponential improvement in dependence on 1/εcompared to the sublinear algorithms of Goldreich, Goldwasser and Ron (JACM'98) and a linear speedup in n compared to the algorithms of Mathieu and Schudy (SODA'08). For the maximization version of k-Correlation Clustering problem our running time is O(k^4 n / ε^2) + k^O(1/ε^2), improving the previously best n k^{O(1/ε^3 log k/ε) by Guruswami and Giotis (SODA'06).

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.