Paper detail

Goal-oriented Composition of Software Process Patterns

The development of high-quality software or software-intensive systems requires custom-tailored process models that fit the organizational and project goals as well as the development contexts. These models are a necessary prerequisite for creating project plans that are expected to fulfill business goals. Although project planners require individual process models custom-tailored to their constraints, software or system developing organizations also require generic processes (i.e., reference processes) that capture project-independent knowledge for similar development contexts. The latter is emphazised by assessment approaches (such as CMMI, SPICE) that require explicit process descriptions in order to reach a certain capability or maturity level. Among other concepts such as polymorphism, templates, or generator-based descriptions, software process patterns are used to describe generic process knowledge. Several approaches for describing the architecture of process patterns have already been published (e.g., [7]). However, there is a lack of descriptions on how to compose process patterns for a specific decelopment context in order to gain a custom-tailored process model for a project. This paper focuses on the composition of process patterns in a goal-oriented way. First, the paper describes which information a process pattern should contain so that it can be used for systematic composition. Second, a composition method is sketched. Afterwards, the results of a proof-of-concept evaluation of the method are described. Finally, the paper is summarized and open research questions are sketched.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.