Paper detail

Goal-oriented a posteriori estimation of numerical errors in the solution of multiphysics systems

This paper develops a general methodology for a posteriori error estimation in time-dependent multiphysics numerical simulations. The methodology builds upon the generalized-structure additive Runge--Kutta (GARK) approach to time integration. GARK provides a unified formulation of multimethods that simulate complex systems by applying different discretization formulas and/or different time steps to individual components of the system. We derive discrete GARK adjoints and analyze their time accuracy. Based on the adjoint method, we establish computable a posteriori identities for the impacts of both temporal and spatial discretization errors on a given goal function. Numerical examples with reaction-diffusion systems illustrate the accuracy of the derived error measures. Local error decompositions are used to illustrate the power of this framework in adaptive refinements of both temporal and spatial meshes.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.