Paper detail

Go Wide or Go Deep: Levering Watermarking Performance with Computational Cost for Specific Images

Digital watermarking has been widely studied for the protection of intellectual property. Traditional watermarking schemes often design in a "wider" rule, which applies one general embedding mechanism to all images. But this will limit the scheme into a robustness-invisibility trade-off, where the improvements of robustness can only be achieved by the increase of embedding intensity thus causing the visual quality decay. However, a new scenario comes out at this stage that many businesses wish to give high level protection to specific valuable images, which requires high robustness and high visual quality at the same time. Such scenario makes the watermarking schemes should be designed in a "deeper" way which makes the embedding mechanism customized to specific images. To achieve so, we break the robustness-invisibility trade-off by introducing computation cost in, and propose a novel auto-decoder-like image-specified watermarking framework (ISMark). Based on ISMark, the strong robustness and high visual quality for specific images can be both achieved. In detail, we apply an optimization procedure (OPT) to replace the traditional embedding mechanism. Unlike existing schemes that embed watermarks using a learned encoder, OPT regards the cover image as the optimizable parameters to minimize the extraction error of the decoder, thus the features of each specified image can be effectively exploited to achieve superior performance. Extensive experiments indicate that ISMark outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by a large margin, which improves the average bit error rate by 4.64% (from 4.86% to 0.22%) and PSNR by 2.20dB (from 32.50dB to 34.70dB).

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.