Paper detail

GMASS Ultradeep Spectroscopy of Galaxies at 1.4<z<2. II. Superdense passive galaxies: how did they form and evolve ?

We combine ultradeep optical spectroscopy from the GMASS project ("Galaxy Mass Assembly ultradeep Spectroscopic Survey") with GOODS multi-band photometry and HST imaging to study a sample of passive galaxiesat 1.39<z<1.99 selected at 4.5 microns. A stacked spectrum with an equivalent integration time of ~500 hours was obtained is publicly released. The spectral and photometric SED properties indicate very weak or absent star formation, moderately old stellar ages of ~1 Gyr (for solar metallicity) and stellar masses in the range of 10^{10-11} solar masses, thus implying that the major star formation and assembly processes for these galaxies occurred at z>2. These galaxies have morphologies that are predominantly compact and spheroidal.However, their sizes (R_e <~ 1 kpc) are much smaller than those of spheroids in the present--day Universe. Their stellar mass surface densities are consequently higher by ~1 dex if compared to spheroids at z~0 with the same mass. Their rest-frame B-band surface brightness scales with the effective radius, but the offset with respect to the surface brightness of the local Kormendy relation is too large to be explained by simple passive evolution. At z~1, a larger fraction of passive galaxies follows the z~0 size -- mass relation. Superdense relics with R_e~1 kpc are extremely rare at z~0 with respect to z>1, and absent if R_e<1 kpc. Because of the similar sizes and mass densities, we suggest that the superdense passive galaxies at 1<z<2 are the remnants of the powerful starbursts occurring in submillimeter--selected galaxies at z>2. The results are compared with theoretical models and the main implications discussed in the framework of massive galaxy formation and evolution.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access16 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.