Paper detail

Gluonic and leptonic decays of heavy quarkonia and the determination of $α_s(m_c)$ and $α_s(m_b)$

QCD running coupling constant $α_s(m_c)$ and $α_s(m_b)$ are determined from heavy quarkonia $c\overline{c}$ and $b\overline{b}$ decays. The decay rates of $V\rightarrow 3g$ and $V\rightarrow e^+ e^-$ for $V=J/ψ$ and $Υ$ are estimated by taking into account both relativistic and QCD radiative corrections. The decay amplitudes are derived in the Bethe-Salpeter formalism, and the decay rates are estimated by using the meson wavefunctions which are obtained with a QCD-inspired inter-quark potential. For the $V\rightarrow 3g$ decay we find the relativistic correction to be very large and to severely suppress the decay rate. Using the experimental values of ratio $R_g\equiv \frac {Γ(V\longrightarrow 3g)}% {Γ(V\longrightarrow e^{+}e^{-})}\approx 10,~32 $ for $V=J/ψ, ~Υ$ respectively, and the calculated widths , we find $α_{s}(m_c)=0.29\pm 0.02 $ and $α_s(m_b)=0.20\pm 0.02$. These values for the QCD running coupling constant are substantially enhanced, as compared with the ones obtained without relativistic corrections, and are consistent with the QCD scale parameter $Λ_{\overline {MS}}^{(4)}% \approx 200MeV$. We also find that these results are mainly due to kinematic corrections and not sensitive to the dynamical models.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.