Gluing derived equivalences together

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Abstract

The Grothendieck construction of a diagram XX of categories can be seen as a process to construct a single category $\Gr(X)$ by gluing categories in the diagram together. Here we formulate diagrams of categories as colax functors from a small category II to the 2-category $\kCat$ of small $\k$-categories for a fixed commutative ring $\k$. In our previous paper we defined derived equivalences of those colax functors. Roughly speaking two colax functors $X, X' \colon I \to \kCat$ are derived equivalent if there is a derived equivalence from X(i)X(i) to X′(i)X'(i) for all objects ii in II satisfying some "II-equivariance" conditions. In this paper we glue the derived equivalences between X(i)X(i) and X′(i)X'(i) together to obtain a derived equivalence between Grothendieck constructions $\Gr(X)$ and $\Gr(X')$, which shows that if colax functors are derived equivalent, then so are their Grothendieck constructions. This generalizes and well formulates the fact that if two $\k$-categories with a GG-action for a group GG are "GG-equivariantly" derived equivalent, then their orbit categories are derived equivalent. As an easy application we see by a unified proof that if two k\Bbbk-algebras AA and A′A' are derived equivalent, then so are the path categories AQAQ and A′QA'Q for any quiver QQ; so are the incidence categories ASAS and A′SA'S for any poset SS; and so are the monoid algebras AGAG and A′GA'G for any monoid GG. Also we will give examples of gluing of many smaller derived equivalences together to have a larger derived equivalence.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.