Paper detail

Globular Cluster Scale Sizes in Giant Galaxies: The Case of M87 and the Role of Orbital Anisotropy and Tidal Filling

We present new Hubble Space Telescope imaging of the outer regions of M87 in order to study its globular cluster (GC) population out to large galactocentric distances. We discuss particularly the relationship between GC effective radii $r_h$ and projected galactocentric distance $R_{gc}$. The observations suggest a shallow trend $r_h \propto R_{gc}^{0.14}$ out to $R_{gc} \sim 100$ kpc, in agreement with studies of other giant elliptical galaxies. To theoretically reproduce this relationship we simulate GC populations with various distributions of orbits. For an isotropic distribution of cluster orbits we find a steeper trend of $r_h \propto R_{gc}^{0.4}$. Instead we suggest that (a) if the cluster system has an orbital anisotropy profile, where orbits become preferentially radial with increasing galactocentric distance, AND (b) if clusters become more tidally under-filling with galactocentric distance, the observed relationship can be recovered. We also apply this approach to the red and blue GC populations separately and predict that red clusters are preferentially under-filling at large $R_{gc}$ and have a more isotropic distribution of orbits than blue clusters.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.