Paper detail

Global Uniqueness and Stability in Determining the Damping Coefficient of an Inverse Hyperbolic Problem with Non-Homogeneous Neumann B.C. through an Additional Dirichlet Boundary Trace

We consider a second-order hyperbolic equation on an open bounded domain $Ω$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$ for $n\geq2$, with $C^2$-boundary $Γ=\paΩ=\bar{Γ_0\cupΓ_1}$, $Γ_0\capΓ_1=\emptyset$, subject to non-homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions on the entire boundary $Γ$. We then study the inverse problem of determining the interior damping coefficient of the equation by means of an additional measurement of the Dirichlet boundary trace of the solution, in a suitable, explicit sub-portion $Γ_1$ of the boundary $Γ$, and over a computable time interval $T>0$. Under sharp conditions on the complementary part $Γ_0= Γ\backslashΓ_1$, $T>0$, and under weak regularity requirements on the data, we establish the two canonical results in inverse problems: (i) uniqueness and (ii) stability (at the $L^2$-level). The latter (ii) is the main result of the paper. Our proof relies on three main ingredients: (a) sharp Carleman estimates at the $H^1 \times L_2$-level for second-order hyperbolic equations \cite{L-T-Z.1}; (b) a correspondingly implied continuous observability inequality at the same energy level \cite{L-T-Z.1}; (c) sharp interior and boundary regularity theory for second-order hyperbolic equations with Neumann boundary data \cite{L-T.4}, \cite{L-T.5}, \cite{L-T.6}, \cite{Ta.3}. The proof of the linear uniqueness result (Section 4, step 5) also takes advantage of a convenient tactical route "post-Carleman estimates" suggested by V.Isakov in \cite[Thm.\,8.2.2, p.\,231]{Is.2}.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.