Paper detail

Global Sensitivity Analysis on Numerical Solver Parameters of Particle-In-Cell Models in Particle Accelerator Systems

Every computer model depends on numerical input parameters that are chosen according to mostly conservative but rigorous numerical or empirical estimates. These parameters could for example be the step size for time integrators, a seed for pseudo-random number generators, a threshold or the number of grid points to discretize a computational domain. In case a numerical model is enhanced with new algorithms and modelling techniques the numerical influence on the quantities of interest, the running time as well as the accuracy is often initially unknown. Usually parameters are chosen on a trial-and-error basis neglecting the computational cost versus accuracy aspects. As a consequence the cost per simulation might be unnecessarily high which wastes computing resources. Hence, it is essential to identify the most critical numerical parameters and to analyze systematically their effect on the result in order to minimize the time-to-solution without losing significantly on accuracy. Relevant parameters are identified by global sensitivity studies where Sobol' indices are common measures. These sensitivities are obtained by surrogate models based on polynomial chaos expansion. In this paper, we first introduce the general methods for uncertainty quantification. We then demonstrate their use on numerical solver parameters to reduce the computational costs and discuss further model improvements based on the sensitivity analysis. The sensitivities are evaluated for neighbouring bunch simulations of the existing PSI Injector II and PSI Ring as well as the proposed Daedalus Injector cyclotron and simulations of the rf electron gun of the Argonne Wakefield Accelerator.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.