Paper detail

Global properties of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 100 TeV

The global properties of the final states produced in hadronic interactions of protons at centre-of-mass energies of future hadron colliders (such as FCC-hh at CERN, and SppC in China), are studied. The predictions of various Monte Carlo (MC) event generators used in collider physics (PYTHIA 6, PYTHIA 8, and PHOJET) and in ultrahigh-energy cosmic-rays studies (EPOS, and QGSJET) are compared. Despite their different underlying modeling of hadronic interactions, their predictions for proton-proton (p-p) collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 100 TeV are quite similar. The average of all MC predictions (except PHOJET) for the different observables are: (i) p-p inelastic cross sections $σ_{\rm inel}$ = 105 $\pm$ 2 mb; (ii) total charged multiplicity $\rm N_{_{\rm ch}}$ = 150 $\pm$ 20; (iii) charged particle pseudorapidity density at midrapidity $\rm dN_{ch}/dη|_{η=0} = 9.6 \pm 0.2$; (iv) energy density at midrapidity $\rm dE/dη|_{η=0} = 13.6 \pm 1.5$ GeV, and $\rm dE/dη|_{η=5} = 670 \pm 70$ GeV at the edge of the central region; and (v) average transverse momenta at midrapidities $\rm < p_{T}> = 0.76 \pm 0.07$ GeV/c. At midrapidity, EPOS and QGSJET-II predict larger per-event multiplicity probabilities at very low ($\rm N_{\rm ch}<3$) and very high ($\rm N_{\rm ch}>100$) particle multiplicities, whereas PYTHIA 6 and 8 feature higher yields in the intermediate region $\rm N_{\rm ch}\approx$ 30--80. These results provide useful information for the estimation of the detector occupancies and energy deposits from pileup collisions at the expected large FCC-hh/SppC luminosities.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.