Paper detail

Global multifluid simulations of the magnetorotational instability in radially stratified protoplanetary disks

The redistribution of angular momentum is a long standing problem in our understanding of protoplanetary disk (PPD) evolution. The magnetorotational instability (MRI) is considered a likely mechanism. We present the results of a study involving multifluid global simulations including Ohmic dissipation, ambipolar diffusion and the Hall effect in a dynamic, self-consistent way. We focus on the turbulence resulting from the non-linear development of the MRI in radially stratified PPDs and compare with ideal MHD simulations. In the multifluid simulations the disk is initially set up to transition from a weak Hall dominated regime, where the Hall effect is the dominant non-ideal effect but approximately the same as or weaker than the inductive term, to a strong Hall dominated regime, where the Hall effect dominates the inductive term. As the simulations progress a substantial portion of the disk develops into a weak Hall dominated disk. We find a transition from turbulent to laminar flow in the inner regions of the disk, but without any corresponding overall density feature. We introduce a dimensionless parameter, $α_\mathrm{RM}$, to characterise accretion with $α_\mathrm{RM} \gtrsim 0.1$ corresponding to turbulent transport. We calculate the eddy turnover time, $t_\mathrm{eddy}$, and compared this with an effective recombination timescale, $t_\mathrm{rcb}$, to determine whether the presence of turbulence necessitates non-equilibrium ionisation calculations. We find that $t_\mathrm{rcb}$ is typically around three orders of magnitude smaller than $t_\mathrm{eddy}$. Also, the ionisation fraction does not vary appreciably. These two results suggest that these multifluid simulations should be comparable to single fluid non-ideal simulations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.