Paper detail

Global model of differential rotation in the Sun

The isorotation contours of the solar convective zone (SCZ) show three distinct morphologies, corresponding to two boundary layers (inner and outer), and the bulk of the interior. Previous work has shown that the thermal wind equation together with informal arguments on the nature of convection in a rotating fluid could be used to deduce the shape of the isorotation surfaces in the bulk of the SCZ with great fidelity, and that the tachocline contours could also be described by relatively simple phenomenology. In this paper, we show that the form of these surfaces can be understood more broadly as a mathematical consequence of the thermal wind equation and a narrow convective shell. The analysis does not yield the angular velocity function directly, an additional surface boundary condition is required. But much can already be deduced without constructing the entire rotation profile. The mathematics may be combined with dynamical arguments put forth in previous works to the mutual benefit of each. An important element of our approach is to regard the constant angular velocity surfaces as an independent coordinate variable for what is termed the "residual entropy," a quantity that plays a key role in the equation of thermal wind balance. The difference between the dynamics of the bulk of the SCZ and the tachocline is due to a different functional form of the residual entropy in each region. We develop a unified theory for the rotational behavior of both the SCZ and the tachocline, using the solutions for the characteristics of the thermal wind equation. These characteristics are identical to the isorotation contours in the bulk of the SCZ, but the two deviate in the tachocline. The outer layer may be treated, at least descriptively, by similar mathematical techniques, but this region probably does not obey thermal wind balance.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.