Paper detail

Global mass segregation in hydrodynamical simulations of star formation

Recent analyses of mass segregation diagnostics in star forming regions invite a comparison with the output of hydrodynamic simulations of star formation. In this work we investigate the state of mass segregation of 'stars' (i.e. sink particles in the simulations) in the case of hydrodynamical simulations which omit feedback. We first discuss methods to quantify mass segregation in substructured regions, either based on the minimum spanning tree (Allison's Lambda), or through analysis of correlations between stellar mass and local stellar surface number densities. We find that the presence of even a single 'outlier' (i.e. a massive object far from other stars) can cause the Allison Lambda method to describe the system as inversely mass segregated, even where in reality the most massive sink particles are overwhelmingly in the centres of the subclusters. We demonstrate that a variant of the Lambda method is less susceptible to this tendency but also argue for an alternative representation of the data in the plane of stellar mass versus local surface number density. The hydrodynamical simulations show global mass segregation from very early times which continues throughout the simulation, being only mildly influenced during sub-cluster merging. We find that up to approx. 2-3% of the "massive" sink particles (m > 2.5 Msun) are in relative isolation because they have formed there, although other sink particles can form later in their vicinity. Ejections of massive sinks from subclusters do not contribute to the number of isolated massive sink particles, as the gravitational softening in the calculation suppresses this process.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.