Paper detail

Global Energetics of Solar Flares: X. Petschek Reconnection Rate and Alfven Mach Number of Magnetic Reconnection Outflows

We investigate physical scaling laws for magnetic energy dissipation in solar flares, in the framework of the Sweet-Parker model and the Petschek model. We find that the total dissipated magnetic energy $E_{diss}$ in a flare depends on the mean magnetic field component $B_f$ associated with the free energy $E_f$, the length scale $L$ of the magnetic area, the hydrostatic density scale height $λ$ of the solar corona, the Alfvén Mach number $M_A=v_1/v_A$ (the ratio of the inflow speed $v_1$ to the Alfvénic outflow speed $v_A$), and the flare duration $τ_f$, i.e., $E_{diss} = (1/4π) B_f^2\ L\ λ v_A\ M_A\ τ_f$, where the Alfvén speed depends on the nonpotential field strength $B_{np}$ and the mean electron density $n_e$ in the reconnection outflow. Using MDI/SDO and AIA/SDO observations and 3-D magnetic field solutions obtained with the vertical-current approximation nonlinear force-free field code (VCA-NLFFF) we measure all physical parameters necessary to test scaling laws, which represents a new method to measure Alfvén Mach numbers $M_A$, the reconnection rate, and the total free energy dissipated in solar flares.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.